Skip to main content

Types of Blinding in Clinical research

 TYPES OF BLINDING IN CLINICAL RESEARCH

BLINDING: 

https://www.slideshare.net/soumyapottola/edit_my_uploads

Blinding is a procedure in which one or more parties in a trial are kept unaware of which treatment arms participants have been assigned to, i.e. which treatment was received.


Blinding is an important aspect of any trial. How a trial was blinded should be accurately recorded in order to allow readers to interpret the results of a study. If blinding is ever broken during a trial on individual participants, it needs to be justified and explained

TYPES OF BLINDIND:

         Blinding                                                          Description

Unblinded or open label                            All are aware of the treatment(s) 

Single blind or single-masked                   The participants are blinded but no one else is masked

Double blind or double-masked                The participants and clinicians / data collectors are blinded 

Triple blind                                                The participants, clinicians / data collectors and outcome                                                                                 adjudicators / data analysts are blinded 



OPEN BLINDING:
An open-label trial is one in which no blinding is used and all parties are aware of the allocation of participants to treatment groups.

Open-label trials may be used:

  • For surgical procedures*.
  • When changes in lifestyle are required.
  • When endpoints are objective and cannot be interpreted in different ways.
  • For studies in life-threatening situations.
  • In post-marketing surveillance.
  • When ethical considerations do not permit blinding.
  • When no control group can be used.


SINGLE BLINDING:
A trial in which one party, the investigator or, usually, the participants, is unaware of what medicine the participant is receiving. Also called single-masked studies they provide some control when double blinding is impossible or not appropriate.
Single-blind trials are used where the experimenters either must know the full facts (for example, when comparing sham to real surgery) and so the experimenters cannot themselves be blind, or where the experimenters will not introduce further bias and so need not be blind. However, there is a risk that subjects are influenced by interaction with the researchers – known as the experimenter's bias.

DOUBLE BLINDING:

A clinical trial design in which neither the participants nor investigators know which participants are receiving the experimental medicine and which are receiving a placebo (or comparator therapy). Double-blind trials are thought to produce objective results, since the expectations of the investigator and the participant do not affect the outcome. Also called double-masked trial.

  • Considered best-controlled trial design.
  • Decreased chance of preconceived notions or physical cues (e.g. the placebo effect, observer bias, experimenter's bias) to distort the results.
  • The key that identifies the participants and which group they belonged to is kept by a third party, and is not revealed to the researchers until the study is over.
  • Should be used whenever possible.
In trials in studies comparing two active compounds (test medicine and comparator) and when the two treatments cannot be made identical, double dummy is a technique for retaining the blind. Supplies are prepared for Treatment A (active and indistinguishable placebo) and for Treatment B (active and indistinguishable placebo). Participants then take two sets of treatment; either A (active) and B (placebo), or A (placebo) and B (active).

For example, if we want to compare two medicines, one presented as green tablets and one as pink capsules, we could also supply green placebo tablets and pink placebo capsules so that both groups of patients would take one green tablet and one pink capsule.

TRIPLE BLINDING:

A triple blind trial means that participants, clinicians, data collectors, outcome adjudicators and data analysts do not have access to details of group assignment. This ensures that bias for or against the tested treatment is very unlikely to occur.

  • Medicine may still be labelled as A or B during analysis.
  • Analyst is blinded to which treatment is which.
  • Helps to avoid bias in the analyzed results.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Difference between central lab and Local Lab

 In the context of clinical trials, both central laboratories (central labs) and local laboratories (local labs) play essential roles in processing and analyzing biological samples. However, they differ significantly in their operations, advantages, and applications. Here’s a detailed comparison: ### Central Laboratory **Definition:** A central laboratory is a large, centralized facility that processes and analyzes samples from multiple sites participating in a clinical trial. These labs are usually equipped with advanced technology and staffed by highly trained personnel. **Key Characteristics:** - **Standardization:** Central labs offer standardized procedures and protocols, ensuring consistent and uniform testing across all samples. - **Quality Control:** They maintain stringent quality control measures, often accredited by recognized bodies (e.g., CAP, CLIA). - **Advanced Technology:** Equipped with state-of-the-art equipment and specialized assays, central labs can perform a w...

clinical data management in Clinical research

 Certainly! Below is an expanded and detailed discussion on clinical data management (CDM) that would cover approximately. --- # Clinical Data Management (CDM) in Clinical Research ## Introduction Clinical Data Management (CDM) is an integral part of the clinical research process, focusing on the collection, cleaning, and management of data generated during clinical trials. The primary objective is to ensure that data is accurate, complete, and reliable, supporting robust conclusions and regulatory submissions. This document provides a comprehensive overview of CDM, including its key components, tools, regulatory and ethical considerations, challenges, and future trends. ## Key Components of Clinical Data Management ### 1. Study Protocol Development The study protocol is the cornerstone of any clinical trial, outlining the study’s objectives, design, methodology, and statistical considerations.  #### Protocol Design - **Objective Setting**: Clearly defining the research questi...

study start up

  STUDY START UP/STUDY SET UP: eCRF(case report form): The case report form is a printed or electronic questionnaire for collecting data from study participants and reporting it to trial sponsors. The document is created specifically for each research project in accordance with the trial protocol, and recommendations of the Clinical Data Acquisitions Standards Harmonization (CDASH). They are developed by Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium to streamline industry-wide data exchange. Say, CDASH dictates dd/mm/yy format for collecting dates. (Read our article on CDISC standards to learn more.) Well-designed case report forms collect only data necessary for the particular study avoiding any redundancy. The fields to be filled in may include demographics (age, gender), basic measurements (height, weight), vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, etc.) captured at various time points, lab exams, medical history, adverse events, and more, based on the research requirements....